Subject of claim:

Termination of the contract of purchase and sale of the vehicle and recovery of funds paid under the contract.

Basis of claim:

The presence of a defect in the form of gasoline entering the engine oil sump, the defendant's refusal to eliminate the specified defect within the framework of warranty repair, since it is not a disadvantage.

Based on the conclusion of the forensic examination, the results of the quality check of the goods, as well as taking into account the testimony given by the forensic expert at the court session that there are no regulatory requirements for increasing the oil level in the engine, and therefore, this is not a disadvantage of the engine, the court refused to satisfy the claims in full.

The full text of the court ruling can be found here:

https://viselkovsky--krd.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=case&case_id=96722439&case_uid=308017f3-01b9-44f2-bafb-e84b2e6da57f&delo_id=1540005