Subject of claim:

Refund of goods purchase price, phase-out of goods

Basis of claim:

Material defect in the goods.

On 16 October 2015 the Zheleznodorozhny District Court of Rostov-on-Don dismissed the claim because there was no defect in the goods. The contract with K. was terminated voluntarily without a defect.

The full text of the court ruling can be found here:

https://zheleznodorozhny--ros.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=case&case_id=112766835&case_uid=205871e9-7e11-43f6-81f9-114404efc7c6&delo_id=1540005

Mass media covered the case:

https://www.autonews.ru/news/5825b0099a79474743132889

https://ria.ru/20150814/1182841096.html

https://rostov.rbc.ru/rostov/21/09/2015/5600172d9a79476731c74061

https://don24.ru/rubric/ekonomika/hyundai-v-sude-s-rostovchaninom-kulakovym-otvetila-ekspertom-na-eksperta.html

https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2834905