Subject of claim:

Termination of the contract of sale, collection of funds, assignment of the obligation to accept the car purchased under the contract of sale.

Basis of claim:

A low-quality product was sold to the Plaintiff, in which, according to the Plaintiff, a significant defect was identified after the expiration of the warranty period for the goods.

During operation, it was revealed that the purchased car has shortcomings caused by the intervention of third parties, the shortcomings were identified for the first time, the cost of their elimination is insignificant, they are not significant. Since there are no significant shortcomings in the car, for which the manufacturer is responsible, the court concluded that there are no factual and legal grounds for satisfying the claims of the court.

The full text of the court ruling can be found here:

https://viselkovsky--krd.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=case&case_id=96722439&case_uid=308017f3-01b9-44f2-bafb-e84b2e6da57f&delo_id=1540005