Subject of claim:

Refund of car purchase price

Basis of claim:

Substantial engine defect

The court found that the defect was unsubstantial and it was due to incorrect operation. Moreover, the procedure for claiming of a refund for goods was violated because the goods warranty had expired. Therefore, the court dismissed the claim.

The full text of the court ruling can be found here:

https://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/cheryomushkinskij/services/cases/civil/details/f8c439cd-164a-45db-bbdf-48284d8b4c11?participants=%D0%92%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B2%D0%BE